Buro Happold, a sustainability leader known for creating long-range plans and benchmarks for leading institutions, companies and municipalities worldwide, has led a team that recently completed key standards for environmental design and construction performance for the University of Southern California.
Buro Happold led the sustainability guideline development process for the University of Southern California with its acclaimed human-centric approach — “ensuring that the built environment touches the earth lightly while also caring for its occupants,” said the firm’s leaders. Also involved in the blue-ribbon team creating the guidelines are the consulting partners Perkins&Will and civil engineer Psomas, as well as AHBE | MIG and David Neuman of Neu Campus Planning.
“Prepared in collaboration with key stakeholders across USC — from faculty and staff to student interns — the USC Sustainable Design & Construction Guidelines advance the University’s commitment to sustainable strategies for the design and construction of new buildings, renovations and asset renewal projects with impacts across multiple areas,” according to Christopher J. Toomey, Vice President & Executive Director of USC Facilities Planning & Management. He added that the guidelines work alongside the USC Facilities Design Guidelines and many of the key goals set in the university commitment document, Assignment: Earth, the 2028 Sustainability Framework covering such areas as zero waste, water reduction and carbon neutrality.
Photo courtesy of Buro Happold
Buro Happold was selected through a competitive process to develop these new sustainable design guidelines for USC, an urban research university ranked among the best in the United States. Buro Happold has created campus-wide standards and overarching sustainability plans for other universities globally and for private corporations such as Aviva Partners, as well as for local governments from the County of Los Angeles to New York’s Battery Park City.
For USC, the new guidelines establish process management guidance for project teams to understand their roles and responsibilities, as well as key sustainability activities required for tracking and reporting. A section on life cycle cost analysis provides a basis for USC to develop cost-effective design options over the lifetime of a project, as well as a method for assessing the environmental impact of project materials.
“USC has embarked on a collaboration with students, faculty and staff from across campus on this development of laudable and comprehensive sustainability guidelines that will guide new construction and renovations, enabling the campus environment to reflect and achieve the university’s sustainability ambitions,” said Kirsten Melling, Buro Happold sustainability associate.
Perkins&Will worked with Buro Happold to create a guideline development process that meaningfully engaged stakeholders, and then focused on defining material strategies and guideline implementation procedures. “The team set out strategies for sustainable construction, focusing on both the chemical health and embodied carbon of building materials,” said Leigh Christy, principal of Perkins&Will. “After working with Buro Happold and the team, we’re proud to say that USC will become one of the first campuses to adopt a formal policy for life cycle analyses to tackle embodied carbon.”
Over recent years, sustainability guidelines and assessment tools have come to be an essential component of long-term campus planning and institutional strategy, according to Melling, and Buro Happold has assisted dozens of institutions worldwide on similar initiatives. Noting their use by many institutions, she adds that the guidelines are becoming increasingly valuable to guide specific aspects of development, such as decarbonization. This shift allows organizations to direct development in alignment with sustainability priorities and provides clear direction to design and construction teams on performance and design aspirations for their built environment.
